OpenWater

OpenWater is worth evaluating when accepted proposals need to become speaker records and a public program without another round of manual collection. Its forms and review workflows can serve associations with several application programs. Demonstrate the administrator experience and language requirements before committing to a configured rollout.

Not publicly confirmed; request an abstract-management quote
Visit OpenWater →
Tool Nutrition Label
Founded Not publicly confirmed
Headquarters Alexandria, Virginia, USA — published contact address
Company Size Not publicly confirmed
Funding Not publicly confirmed
Pricing Model Configured application and review platform; license units and add-ons need confirmation
Free Trial Product demonstration offered; free self-service trial not publicly confirmed
Contract Not publicly confirmed
Attendee Capacity Not publicly confirmed
Mobile App Conference mobile app offered; current operating systems and offline scope not publicly confirmed
Offline Capability Not verified
Data & Compliance Not publicly confirmed
Expertise Level Intermediate
Event Types
Association conferencesScientific meetingsCall-for-speaker programsAwards and application programs
Support Channels
Sales demonstrationEmailTelephone
Best For
  • + Associations moving proposals through review into a conference schedule
  • + Programs collecting files and speaker materials with conditional forms
  • + Teams connecting conference content with an existing membership database
Not For
  • − Programs requiring right-to-left submitter or reviewer interfaces
  • − Buyers requiring a public fixed subscription price
  • − Teams unable to configure forms, rubrics and administrator workflows
Key Capabilities
✓ Build a branded conference submission site
✓ Collect conditional forms, speaker information and attached files
✓ Assign submissions to multiple reviewers across review rounds
✓ Organize accepted abstracts into conference sessions
✓ Publish a public conference calendar
✓ Collect final speaker materials and send deadline reminders
✓ Report on submission and review activity
✓ Connect content with supported membership and CRM systems after scoping the integration
Honest Limitations

Language direction is a stated boundary

The official FAQ supports languages read and written from left to right on submitter and reviewer interfaces. Verify requirements for other writing directions before selection.

Administrator workflows need a trial

Ellie M. described formatting friction in April 2026, while a separate conference-proposal reviewer found the dashboard difficult to navigate. These individual accounts support testing the exact setup.

Commercial and integration scope needs a quote

No current numeric license price was established. Confirm included programs, review volume, mobile app entitlement, integration work and ongoing support.

Pricing Breakdown
Plan Price Details
Abstract and application management Not publicly confirmed; quote required Scope forms, review rounds, speaker workflows and program publication.
Connected services and implementation Terms to confirm Ask which CRM/AMS connections, mobile app and configuration services are included.

Cost at Common Event Sizes

100
attendees
Quote required
No public event or submission unit price was established. Quote actual proposal volume, programs and integration scope; attendee count alone does not determine cost.
500
attendees
Quote required
No public event or submission unit price was established. Quote actual proposal volume, programs and integration scope; attendee count alone does not determine cost.
1000
attendees
Quote required
No public event or submission unit price was established. Quote actual proposal volume, programs and integration scope; attendee count alone does not determine cost.

Hidden Costs to Watch

  • ! Request the actual licensing unit, renewal terms and application-volume limits.
  • ! Separate migration, custom integrations, training and optional app services in the proposal.
  • ! No third-party directory price is substituted for a current official quote.

OpenWater connects a call for proposals with the work that follows acceptance: speaker materials, sessions and a public calendar. Build the demonstration around the full content journey, including a late file replacement and a reviewer reassignment.

The broader application platform can be useful to associations managing several programs. A proposal should still specify the conference workflow, language support and the systems that need to exchange data.

Sources

Comparing this with other event tools?

Get a shortlist of the best-fit options for your event workflow.

Questions to Ask the Vendor
  1. 1
    What licensing units and application volumes determine our quote?
  2. 2
    How will our languages and scientific characters render for submitters and reviewers?
  3. 3
    Can we test assignment, scoring and reporting as a program administrator?
  4. 4
    Which membership or CRM fields sync and who maintains the connection?
  5. 5
    Which mobile app, support and renewal entitlements are included?
How we research tools

We research each tool by reviewing official documentation, pricing pages, and user feedback from Trustpilot, G2, and Capterra. If something's out of date or inaccurate, use the link below to flag it.

Suggest a correction →